Demonstrating against the media law in Hungary

Thousands gathered in front of the Parliament building in Budapest © Ádám Szigeti

By Dori Átol, campaign coordinator of Amnesty International Hungary

Despite freezing conditions around 6-8,000 people gathered in front of the Parliament building in Budapest on 27 January to protest against the media law that came into effect in Hungary on 1 January this year.

Additionally there were close to 9,000 people who were following the event live on-line. This might not seem to be a large number, however, having a 15, 000 crowd is very significant in a country where the culture of civil activism is yet at its beginning stages.

This was already the second round of street protests regarding the media law. The first took place two weeks earlier, on 14 January. Since the government has not taken any measures yet to amend the laws, Amnesty International Hungary decided to be part of the second demonstration as well as one of the organizers.

Amnesty International raised concerns, because the breadth of the restrictions contained in the new legislation on media content, the lack of clear guidelines for journalists and editors, and the strong powers of the new regulatory body all risk placing unnecessary and disproportionate restrictions to freedom of expression in Hungary which go beyond legitimate restrictions on freedom of expression under international human rights law.

A diverse group of musicians, including a pop singer, a rapper, an alternative rock group and a Roma band entertained the crowd, and speeches were delivered by the head of the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, a well-known media expert, and Orsolya Jeney, the director of Amnesty International Hungary.

Amnesty International Hungary’s director said on stage that “as a result of the law, media can go mute not only in protest of the law, but also out of fear. It could induce self-censorship. Silence could fall upon valuable sources that provide insightful, extensive and thorough information.”

Referring to international and European human rights standards (ICCPR, ECHR, the EU’s FRC)  Amnesty International has called upon Hungary to respect its obligations to protect the freedom of expression, including the right to seek, impart and hold opinion and information freely, without the interference of any authorities.

Immediately following the demonstration, the Washington Times reported that the representative of the United States to the OSCE expressed his government’s concern over the Hungarian media law.

Concurrently with the demonstration in Budapest, Amnesty International sections from around the world sent letters to Hungarian embassies to convey our concerns about the media laws.

Amnesty International has launched a web-action for people who share the organization’s concern to write a letter to the Hungarian Prime Minister, asking him to amend the laws so that they are brought in line with international human rights standards.

At the rally a next round of demonstrations was announced for 15 March, a national holiday in Hungary commemorating the events of 1848-49, when Hungarian revolutionaries championed, amongst others, the freedom of press.

Amnesty International Hungary will take part in the upcoming demonstration if by then no measures have been taken by the government to amend the laws in line with the right to freedom of expression.

Posted in Human Rights Defenders and Activists, Hungary, International Organizations | 5 Comments

  1. C White says:

    The Hungarian Media law is in line with EU standards, only minor technical matters were found that might, just might need harmonisation. Amnesty International has no Amnesty International has no right to call upon Hungary to respect its obligations to protect the freedom of expression, becuause it is already in place. Do you have any example of the contrary? NO! Hungary’s press is free, which includes the right to seek, impart and hold opinion and information freely, without the interference of any authorities.
    Amnesty International should have read the law first….This article does not condemn Hungary, but reflects how ignorant, ill – informed and inadequatly researched this matter is. READ THE HUNGARIAN MEDIA LAW FIRST!!!!

  2. Nicholas Molnar says:

    Happy to see that they have nothing else to do. Also, there were no mounted police like under the Gyurcsany Era.

  3. MEF says:

    Sorry guys but why then was it so criticised by the EU. Maybe you should first check the law then the ICCPR and other relevant human rights standards and stop politicising the issue. I’m not Hungarian but this Gyurcsany vs. Orban discourse when dealing with freedom of expression makes me sick!

  4. Attila says:

    Ok… so the Hungarian Media Law saga finihed with the voted out liberal party’s total defeat. It looks like they have unprofessional enough media connections on the “west” who trompetig their half cooked revenge on Orban…

  5. Szabad Ember says:

    Attila, when you say the liberal party’s total defeat, do you mean SZDSZ? If so, what does that have to do with the Media Law, which was introduced well after SZDSZ was eliminated from Parliament? Besides, anyone who follows current events can see that the saga is far from over, and the government was pushed into changing the law by the EU. When you write “unprofessional”, do you even understand what that means? Also, just because someone disagrees with Orban’s policies and tries to stop him from doing something doesn’t mean that that person is trying to get revenge on Orban.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>