How many more? – Syria conflict refugees top 2 million

The UN refugee agency has announced that the number of refugees from the Syrian armed conflict has surpassed 2 million. © SAFIN HAMED/AFP/Getty Images

By Charlotte Phillips, Amnesty International’s researcher on Refugee and Migrants’ Rights

Read a version of this blog on CNN’s Global Public Square

It is difficult not to feel overwhelmed by the scale and brutality of the conflict in Syria, the massive displacement and deep suffering it is causing countless human beings.

António Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, has described the Syrian conflict as “the great tragedy of this century – a disgraceful humanitarian calamity with suffering and displacement unparalleled in recent history”.

This situation has deteriorated rapidly in recent weeks after videos emerged showing scores of civilians apparently killed by chemical weapons in towns outside Damascus.

In the past 24 hours, the United Nations has announced that the number of refugees from Syria has officially reached 2 million, a tragic milestone. At least 1 million are children, many under the age of 11. But as with all statistics, this only tells us part of the story because behind every number is the human story of someone who has experienced extraordinary loss.

At Amnesty International’s headquarters in London, we receive almost daily phone calls and emails from these individuals and families, many of them now in the neighbouring countries of Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt, and increasingly further afield. People are reaching out – asking for help, for advice, for material assistance, for their rights to be protected. They want to be able to start their lives again – and more and more believe they can only do this in another safe country.

Because, after all the pain and suffering that people have endured in Syria, the reality is that life is extremely hard for refugees in the neighbouring countries.

My colleagues and I recently returned from Za’atri refugee camp in Jordan, now the second-largest refugee camp in the world after Kenya’s sprawling Dadaab camp. It has unofficially become Jordan’s fourth-largest city. It currently hosts almost 130,000 refugees from Syria with significant numbers of children and vulnerable individuals, some who have survived torture, are seriously injured or sick, are elderly or have disabilities.

The UN and organizations working on the ground have made a number of appeals to the international community for funding – because, despite some significant donations, essential services such as food assistance, education, a more reliable water supply system and shelter continue to be seriously underfunded. And it is not just Za’atri or indeed Jordan where there is a shortfall in funding to protect and assist refugees.

The same is true across the region where refugees, particularly in community settings, are struggling to access services, and host countries are buckling under the strain. All these host countries are facing significant economic and political challenges due to the influx – the increased pressure on local services, meanwhile, is exacerbating tensions between refugees and local communities.

So, as many people have asked in recent days and months, what can be done?

With no political solution in sight for Syria, the very least that can be done is to allow those who have escaped with their lives to live in safety and dignity. The UN estimates that almost US$3 billion is currently needed for it to meet the needs of refugees in the region and, in June, launched the largest humanitarian appeal in its history. To date, the United States, Kuwait and the European Commission have been amongst the largest donors. But despite this, the appeal is currently only 40 per cent funded. Countries with the means to do so – European countries, North America, the Gulf states and elsewhere, must continue to scale up their funding to the refugee crisis and should plan to provide sustained, long-term support to Syria’s neighbours.

But this alone will not alleviate the refugee crisis. Donor governments should be prepared to take the most vulnerable refugees out of the region and allow them to settle safely in their countries, via resettlement and humanitarian admission programmes. As well as providing a very real lifeline for the most vulnerable, this will help to alleviate some of the burden being borne by Syria’s neighbours.

While Germany has so far agreed to take 5,000 Syrian refugees via a humanitarian admission programme, the response from other countries has been more limited to date.

If you live in a country that could and should do more for the people of Syria, then now is the time to call on your government to increase their support for refugees from Syria. There has been a lot of talk in recent weeks about what the international community should or shouldn’t do in relation to the Syria conflict. Supporting the refugees is unquestionably something they can do, and must do to a far greater extent.

Read more:
Syria: Military intervention – six key points (Blog, 29 August 2013)
Syria: Possible international armed intervention after alleged chemical weapons attack (Q&A, 29 August 2013)
Enough hand-wringing on Syria (Op-ed, 22 August 2013)

Posted in Middle East And North Africa, Refugees, Syria | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

  1. giulia says:

    hi, i’m from italy and i would like to help you. what could i do?

  2. Laura Schlegel says:

    I’m a firm believer money and energy is best invested on International Diplomacy and humanitarian corridors to facilitate med, food, water aid, conflict resolution, peace building, sustainability from within only!

  3. What has happened to Syria over the past few years is an unspeakable tragedy. But it is also the most glaring example of the total inadequacy of our present attitude to international order. The Russian initiative to avoid a military strike whilst neutralizing chemical weapons is something of a breakthrough, a glimpse into an avenue all people of goodwill should explore. The positive American response to this initiative offers hope for a much more constructive future for the planet than we have seen since 1945. I would like to see ALL weapons and their users passing from National to UN control. We may be able to start with Syria’s chemical weapons but this is but a start. We need to make a quantum leap in our thinking if we are to shake off the antiquated ideas which have fostered wars and move on to where we should have been long before now. We will pay a huge price if we continue to drag our feet. Many individuals are doing heroic work as Peacekeepers but they are constantly thwarted because there are no structures for international governance in this and other areas of global concern. How can one bring peace when there are rival armies seeking to eliminate each other? There should be NO legal rival armies. Please go to:
    http://www.garrettjones.talktalk.net
    Best wishes,
    John Garrett Jones
    [You will find a brief biography at the link at bottom of my homepage]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>